Sourcing Methods | An Introduction to Procurement | Back to Basics

28 January 20243

Sourcing Methods: An Introduction to Procurement

Understand Strategic Sourcing. A non-exhaustive list of various methods for procurement and when to employ them for maximum benefit.

Choosing the right sourcing method is one of the highest-leverage decisions in procurement. This guide covers what to prepare before you source, which method fits which scenario, and how to apply the full strategic procurement process.

Sourcing Methods: How to Choose the Correct One

Sourcing is the process of identifying and selecting suppliers who can provide the goods or services a business requires. It sounds straightforward — but the method you choose determines far more than who fills the order. It shapes the quality of what you receive, the total cost over time, the risks you carry, and the relationships you build.

This article is a practical reference for procurement managers, operations leaders, and project managers who need to match a sourcing method to a specific scenario. It covers the four preparation steps every procurement should begin with, and a side-by-side comparison of six sourcing methods — from open tendering to single source procurement — with the advantages, challenges, and best-fit scenarios for each.

“The right sourcing method is not the one with the most competition or the least paperwork. It is the one that best fits the complexity, timeline, and risk profile of the requirement.”

Before You Source

Four Preparation Steps for Any Procurement Project

Selecting a sourcing method without completing these steps is one of the most common — and costly — mistakes in procurement. Each step below expands to reveal the key questions your team should answer before issuing any solicitation.

1. Identify Procurement Policy and Legal Requirements

Before you start looking for suppliers, it is important to have clarity of the businesses underlying objectives, to know the purpose of purchasing anything through a formal process, and to understand the procurement policies that are in place at an organization.

It is equally important to be familiar with whichever legislated regulations guide your company’s activities as there are various regulations depending on whether a company is a private or public entity, and these change depending on which industry a business operates within.

Before looking for suppliers, understand the organizational objectives behind this purchase, the procurement policies in place, and any legislation that applies. Whether your organization is public or private — and the industry it operates in — determines which rules govern your process.

Questionnaire:

Policy and Regulations:
  • Is your organization a public or private entity?
  • What sector does your company operate within?
  • Are there special rules or standards that govern your industry?
  • What procurement policy exists at your organization?
  • Are there spending thresholds that require pre-approval?
  • Who is the authorized approver for this procurement?
  • Does federal or provincial public procurement legislation apply?
Back-to-Basics: “The Benefits of Procurement Policies”
SCLCI Back-to-Basics: "The Benefits of Procurement Policies"

2. Prepare for a Sourcing Project in Procurement

Use this questionnaire to help prepare for a procurement by evaluating current priorities, existing opportunities, and understanding any limitations for sourcing goods and services.

Use these questions to evaluate priorities, surface existing resources, and understand any constraints before selecting a sourcing method. This step narrows your options and ensures the method chosen aligns with both the business unit’s needs and the organization’s broader objectives.

Questionnaire:

Requirements Identification:
  • Is this essential to a project or to ongoing operations? Understand urgency, internal risks, and dependencies.
  • Does your company already have it in stock or on order? Understand operational cost and sourcing complexity.
  • Is another department already purchasing this under an existing contract? Identify available internal resources and potential cost savings.
  • What are the technical specifications or criteria — clearly distinguish must-haves from nice-to-haves with stakeholders and subject matter experts.
  • What budget is allocated and does a procurement policy govern this spend level?

 

3. Estimate the cost of your procurement.

When the project requires, collect research on the market prices for products or services required and ensure they are comparable to the estimates or budget if received elsewhere.

In some situations, the purchase request may arrive from a department with an estimate in place and already be pre-approved by a project manager, department manager, and/or have specific detail regarding anticipated costs and quality.

Establish a market research process for new procurement projects related to your industry and use this to validate cost estimates where needed. Benchmarking activities may uncover the true value and real total costs of a purchase prior to finalizing an estimate, drafting a budget, or seeking approvals from department managers if authorizations are needed for the spend amount.

Collect market pricing research for the goods or services required and validate estimates before seeking approvals. Benchmarking early uncovers the true total cost of a purchase — and provides the negotiating foundation that procurement teams need.
Market research enables:
  • Better price negotiation — grounded in real market data rather than supplier-provided estimates
  • Discovery and leverage of corporate buying power
  • Adherence to an allocated budget without surprises
  • Best value per dollar spent
  • Containment of tail spend and avoidance of project cost overruns
Note: Purchase requests that arrive from departments may already include an estimate and pre-approval. Market research remains valuable here — use it to validate rather than duplicate the work already done.
4. Get all required approvals and authorizations.
Before issuing any RFP, IFB, or RFQ, confirm that funding is in place and all authorizations are secured. Issuing a solicitation without confirmed backing wastes supplier time, damages organizational credibility, and creates compliance exposure.
Authorization checklist
  • Purchase order request submitted
  • Project estimate reviewed and approved
  • Purchase order allocation confirmed
  • Project budget validated
  • Spending authorization obtained from authorized approver

When preparations are complete, review the different sourcing methods and evaluate their suitability for specific purchasing scenarios.

 

Sourcing Methods

The Methods Compared
Six Sourcing Methods and When to Use Each

With preparation complete, the next decision is which sourcing method fits the requirement. Each method below carries its own logic — select the tab that matches your scenario, or work through all six to build a working reference for your team.

 

Open Tendering

Open tendering is a sourcing method that involves inviting any qualified supplier to bid for a contract. It is also known as competitive bidding or open solicitation.

The advantages of open tendering are:

  • Encourages competition and transparency among suppliers.
  • Allows new or emerging suppliers to participate and showcase their capabilities.
  • Grants the contract to the lowest cost provider, which can save money for your business.

The disadvantages of open tendering are:

  • Takes time and resources to evaluate all bids, which can delay the procurement process.
  • May not be suitable for complex or large acquisitions, as it may compromise quality or innovation for price.
  • Could create adversarial relationships with suppliers because they may feel pressured to lower their prices or standards.

Open tendering is best for scenarios where:

  • You have simple and well-defined requirements that can be easily communicated and measured.
  • You have a large pool of potential suppliers who can meet your requirements.
  • You want to achieve the best value for money and minimize your procurement costs.
Restricted Tendering

Restricted tendering is a sourcing method that involves limiting the number of suppliers who can bid for a contract. It is also known as selective tendering or invitation to tender.

The advantages of restricted (“limited”) tendering are:

  • Reduces the time and cost of evaluation, as you only deal with a few qualified and experienced suppliers.
  • Ensures quality and reliability of suppliers, as you can pre-screen them based on your criteria and preferences.
  • Allows more negotiation and clarification with suppliers, as you can have more interaction and feedback with them.

The disadvantages of restricted (“limited bidding”) tendering are:

  • It reduces the level of competition and transparency among suppliers, which may limit your options and opportunities.
  • It may exclude potential suppliers who are not on the invitation list, which may result in missing out on better offers or solutions.
  • It may create bias or favoritism among suppliers, as they may feel privileged or entitled to win the contract.

Restricted tendering is best for scenarios where:

  • You have complex or unclear requirements that need more discussion and customization with suppliers.
  • You have a small pool of potential suppliers who have specialized skills or expertise that you need.
  • You want to achieve the best quality and performance of goods or services and minimize your procurement risks.
Request for Proposal (RFP)
Request for proposal (RFP) is a sourcing method that involves soliciting proposals from potential suppliers for a project that has complex or unclear requirements. It may be preceded by a request for information or (RFI) when buyers seek to understand the availability of solutions and market better.

The advantages of RFP are:

  • It allows suppliers to propose creative and customized solutions that meet your specific needs and challenges.
  • It enables comparison of different proposals based on multiple criteria, such as price, quality, innovation, and sustainability.
  • It facilitates dialogue and collaboration with suppliers, as you can ask questions, provide feedback, and negotiate terms.

The disadvantages of RFP are:

  • It requires more time and effort to prepare and evaluate proposals, as you need to define your requirements clearly and review each proposal thoroughly.
  • It may result in higher costs or risks due to uncertainty or changes in requirements, as you may not know exactly what you want or need at the beginning of the process.
  • It may lead to disputes or conflicts over contract terms or scope, as there may be discrepancies or misunderstandings between your expectations and the supplier’s deliverables.

RFP is best for scenarios where:

  • You have complex or unique requirements that need more exploration and innovation from suppliers.
  • You have a limited pool of potential suppliers who have the capability and experience to handle your project.
  • You want to achieve the best solution and value for your business and minimize your procurement risks.
Two-Stage Tendering

In it’s simplest form, the two-stage tendering offers the company more integration at the tendering stage with the contractors proposals. In various processes, the two stage bidding enables a formal split between components of the proposal such as technical and financial bids, or the pre-qualification based on meeting set criteria followed by the competitive process based on scores awarded for value indicators like price.

In two-stage bidding, there are variations in the process for submitting bids. This may be done at one time with the financial and technical components submitted simultaneously, opened sequentially depending on whether a bid has met the initial qualifications within the first round.

Likewise, the use of the two stage bidding process may provide opportunities for clarification and greater input of technical expertise by the contractors prior to the second phase of the process. In this manner, there is a higher likelihood that the proposal will have more accuracy pricing for risk and for designing a solution resembling the final the constructed project.

Two-stage tendering is a sourcing method that involves two rounds of bidding:

  1. The first phase identifies a shortlist of qualified, interested, and responsive suppliers.
  2. The second to stage or ‘phase’ will award the contract based on price and/or technical aspects.

This process is also known as pre-qualification tendering; or two-stage one envelope; or two-stage two-envelope tendering.  

The advantages of two-stage tendering are:

  • It combines the benefits of open and restricted tendering, as it allows competition and transparency in the first stage and quality and reliability in the second stage.
  • It allows more flexibility and interaction with suppliers, as you can refine your requirements and specifications after the first stage.
  • It reduces the number of bids to be evaluated in the second stage, as you only deal with a few shortlisted suppliers.

The disadvantages of two-stage tendering are:

A disadvantage is that this method increases the time and cost of the procurement process, as two rounds of bidding and evaluation are necessary.

Two-stage tendering may discourage some suppliers from participating in the first stage, because they may not be willing to invest time and resources without knowing their chances of being awarded the contract.

The risk of increasing costs and over-inflated prices rises exponentially with the appointment of the contractor following the award for financial competition when completed in round two. This is especially true given that the negotiating leverage or the company is lost without competition.

Two-stage tendering is best for scenarios where:

  • You have large or complex projects that require extensive planning and coordination with suppliers.
  • You have a moderate pool of potential suppliers who have varying levels of qualifications and experience.
  • Companies require extensive control over the process and integration with interested suppliers to begin design of a technical solution. The two stage process provides opportunity to split bid submittal into two parts, acting more

Request for Quotation (RFQ)

Request for quotation (RFQ) is a sourcing method that involves requesting price quotes from potential suppliers for a project that has simple and well-defined requirements. It is also known as invitation to quote or request for bid.

The advantages of RFQ are:

  • It simplifies and speeds up the procurement process, as you only need to compare prices from different suppliers.
  • It minimizes the administrative burden and paperwork, as you only need to provide basic information about your project and requirements.
  • It ensures accuracy and consistency of quotes, as you can specify the format and details of the quotes.

The disadvantages of RFQ are:

  • It limits the scope for negotiation or innovation with suppliers, as you only focus on price as the main criterion.
  • It may not reflect the quality or value of the goods or services, as you may not consider other factors such as delivery time, warranty, or customer service.
  • It may not be suitable for complex or large projects, as you may not be able to define your requirements precisely or anticipate potential changes or issues.

RFQ is best for scenarios where:

  • You have simple and standardized requirements that can be easily communicated and measured.
  • You have a large pool of potential suppliers who can offer competitive prices for your project.
  • You want to achieve the lowest cost possible and maximize your procurement savings.
Single-Source Procurement

Single-source procurement is a sourcing method that involves awarding a contract to one supplier without a competitive process such as tendering bids from other suppliers.

Single sourcing differs from sole sourcing in that there are available alternative suppliers that can fulfill the same requirement for goods and/or services. However, they not engaged prior to the contract being awarded.

Whereas sole-sourcing only occurs when there is no existing alternative to using one supplier for a given reason. Accepted reasons include low contract values, security and sensitivity of information in a procurement, or proprietary information and specialized knowledge of processes required for the project.

Examples of Sole Sourcing with justification may include:

A requirement for items that utilize proprietary software where no substitution exists and an alternative cannot be developed without significant cost, or loss of quality and capability.

A procurement project which includes a requisition that is sensitive in nature such as containing security related details for a corporation. Where placing an advertisement for solicitation of bids is not in the best interest of the organization.

Example of Single Sourcing

A purchase agreement whereby the supplier is awarded one-hundred percent of the business and will provide the purchaser with all they require of a specific product or service regardless of the total contract value.

Substack: Read more on single – vs. sole sourcing

 

The Full Picture

Strategic Procurement

Sourcing method selection sits at stage three of a complete strategic procurement cycle. Understanding the full process helps procurement and operations leaders see where each method fits — and what comes before and after the sourcing decision.

Conclusion

The key to successful sourcing is to understand the requirements and business objectives for the project, to gain an understanding of the market and qualifications for suppliers, then evaluate which approach is best to achieve the desired result.

By evaluating which approach to take before a procurement managers understand the benefits or difficulties behind each method and can select the best sourcing process for their requirement.

Avoid unnecessary risk and ensure successful contracting with an available and reliable supplier that will provide the goods or services for the greatest possible value.

Back-to-Basics: “The Benefits of Strategic Sourcing”

SCLCI Back-to-Basics: "The Benefits of Strategic Sourcing"

 

At Supply Chain Logistics Consulting our mandate is to improve the way things are done.

Do you have a specific problem you are solving? A unique solution or story about making a significant change?

Let us know.

If you need expertise for your business or project and want to learn more about our management consulting services, please contact us today. S&Co., Supply Chain Logistics Consulting is a professional management consulting practice with years of experience in helping people at businesses like yours..

 

Subscribe and connect on all of your social channels.

3 comments

  • temp mail

    3 February 2024 at 12:21 pm

    While I typically refrain from reading blog articles, I must express my strong interest in this particular post and urge you to do so. Your writing style has truly impressed me. Thank you for sharing this wonderful article.

  • LS

    11 February 2024 at 1:41 pm

    I luckily stumbled upon this brilliant site earlier this week, they provide great info for members. The site owner excels at informing the community. I’m impressed and hope they continue their magnificent service.

Comments are closed.

https://supplychainlogistics.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Supply-Chain-Logo-FC.png
About Us

At Supply Chain Logistics Consulting we improve business performance with strategic supply chain development consulting. Discover greater value and streamline your business operations, today. Let’s work together to enact sustainable improvements that contribute to your organizations goals and objectives.

Connect

FIND PREMIUM SUBSCRIPTIONS HERE

Perferred by professionals and business owners.

Sign up to get updates from Supply Chain Logistics Consulting delivered directly to your email inbox.

At S&Co., Supply Chain Logistics Consulting Inc. the work we do may be within Indigenous Territories and Treaty areas in what is now called Canada. We acknowledge these lands, the traditional Knowledge Keepers, and Elders, here now and throughout history with respectful gratitude as an act of Reconciliation recommended by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s 94 Calls to Action.

© S&Co., Supply Chain Logistics Consulting Inc. | All Rights Reserved | Website by Aroma Web Design | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service